m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes

Ordinary Council Meeting

6 December 2010, 7:00pm

All minutes are subject to confirmation at a subsequent

meeting and may be amended by resolution at that meeting.


Ordinary Council 6 December 2010

 

Minutes

 

 

 

PRESENT: Councillor W. Gaffney (Chair), Councillor S. Bennison, Councillor D. Brooks-Horn, Councillor S. Forrest, Councillor I. Longbottom, Councillor K. Mcilroy, Councillor P. Palmer, Councillor A. Smith and Councillor R. Tudge.

 

ALSO PRESENT: General Manager, Executive Manager – Corporate Services, Executive Manager – Environmental Services, Executive Manager – Open Space & Urban Services, Executive Manager – Human Services, Manager – Development Assessment, Manager – Strategic Planning, Manager – Special Projects and Office Manager – Corporate Services.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST:

Councillor Bennison declared non pecuniary, non significant conflict of interest in Notice of Motion No. 16 as one of his clients owns an affected business in the Lane Cove Plaza.  He indicated he would speak and vote on the item.

Councillor Longbottom declared a conflict of interest in Notice of Motion No. 22.  He indicated he would not speak or vote on the item.

 

OPENING OF MEETING WITH PRAYER

The meeting was opened with a prayer by Rev. Jean Winter of St Andrews Uniting Church, Longueville.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

The Mayor gave an acknowledgement of Country.

 

WEBCASTING OF COUNCIL MEETING

The Mayor advised those present that the Meeting was being webcast.

 

 

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS

463

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Gaffney and Mcilroy that Standing Orders be suspended and that members of the public who wish to address Council be allowed to do so for a maximum of three minutes.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

PUBLIC FORUM

 

Paul Hammett, 29 Longueville Rd Lane Cove, highlighting his concerns regarding development planning within Lane Cove going forward, specifically in relation to 25-29 Longueville Rd.

 

Ian Biner, 1A Burley St Lane Cove, opposing the LEP recommendations for 1A Burley St.

 

Peter Baum, 4 Birdwood Ave Lane Cove, supporting an increase to the height and FSR on the South side of Birdwood Ave.

 

Luke Beuchat, 43 Berry Rd St Leonards, in support of the Section 96 Application for 43 Berry St as per Environmental Services Division Report No. 455.

 

Helen Stumbaum, speaking on behalf of Megan Hassall of 45 Berry Rd, St Leonards in opposition to the Section 96 applications for 43 and 43a Berry Rd, St Leonards.

 

Norma Stuart, 21A William Edwards St Longueville, in support of Notice of Motion No. 13 for Wildlife Protection Areas within Lane Cove reserves.

 

Jesse Death, 43A Berry Rd St Leonards, supporting the Section 96 application for the for 43A Berry St as per Environmental Services Division Report No. 457.

 

Terry Hughes, speaking on behalf of SC Johnson, requesting Council continue to oppose any change of zoning at 150 Epping Rd that allows for residential / mixed use purposes.

 

Don Murchison, 37 Innes Rd Greenwich, thanked Clr Longbottom for his support of artists in the Lane Cove community through the Village Observer.  He expressing his appreciation of the publication and its commitment to artists and also his support for the proposed infrastructure levy, highlighting the need for these funds for off road cycling infrastructure in the area.

 

Warwick Pulley, 546 Mowbray Rd Lane Cove, opposed to downgrading the zoning of the Mowbray precinct to less than High Density Residential (R4).

 

Chris Young, Planning Consultant for residents of 17 Anglo Rd, opposing the Development Application for 16 Greenwich Rd as it will adversely affect his clients.

 

Asta Chow, 17 Anglo Rd, Greenwich, opposing the proposed development at 16 Greenwich Rd.

 

Myra Tustian, 12 Anglo Rd Greenwich, speaking on behalf of Mr O’Farrell and Ms McIntyre of 8 Greenwich Rd, in opposition to the development application for 16 Greenwich Rd.

 

Kim Pearce, 24 Anglo Rd Greenwich, opposing the proposed development for 16 Greenwich Rd.

 

Peter Hardy, 18A Birdwood Ave Lane Cove, in support of increasing the FSR and height zoning in Birdwood Ave.

 

Frances Vissel, speaking on behalf of the Stringybark Creek Residents Association in support of Councils recommendation for re-zoning the Mowbray area to Environmental E4 and Medium Density Residential R3, stating it is unsuitable for high density accommodation.

 

David Turner,  8 Anglo Rd Greenwich,  opposing the DA for 16 Greenwich Rd and requesting Council reject the application or modify it substantially to address the concerns of adjoining property owners.

 

Michael Hone, 8 Birdwood Ave Lane Cove, supporting the rezoning of Birdwood Ave to allow for increased height and FSR.

 

Barbara Kahlifa, 3 Sutherland St Lane Cove, supporting the rezoning of the Mowbray Precinct to Environmental E4 and Medium Density Residential R3 and the proposed infrastructure levy.

 

Kenta Kamiya,  548 Mowbray Rd, opposed to downgrading the zoning of the Mowbray precinct to Environmental E4 and Medium Density Residential R3 from the existing High Density R4.

 

Steven Abolakian, Hyecorp Property Group, opposed to the rezoning of the Mowbray Precinct to Environmental E4 and Medium Density Residential R3 from the existing High Density R4 zoning on behalf of affected stakeholders, i.e. residents and developers.

 

Natalie Clarke, 10 Merinda St Lane Cove North, supporting the rezoning of the Mowbray Precinct to Environmental E4 and Medium Density Residential R3.

 


 

Resumption of Standing Orders

464

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Smith that Standing Orders be resumed.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Procedural Motion

465

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Gaffney and Smith that the Services and Resources Committee items be brought forward into Council and be dealt with as the last item.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 15 NOVEMBER 2010

466

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Mcilroy that the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on the 15 November 2010 be received.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

467

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Mcilroy that the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on the 15 November 2010 be confirmed.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Procedural Motion

468

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Longbottom and Gaffney that the Environmental Services Division Reports referred from the Inspection Committee of the 4th December 2010 and the LEP Review – Supplementary Report be brought forward and dealt with at this time.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

Reports Of Committees

 

Report Of Committees No. 51

SUBJECT: Inspection Committee 4 December 2010

469

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Bennison and Brooks-Horn that the Minutes of the Inspection Committee of 4 December 2010 be received and noted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Referred ReportS FROM Inspection Committee 04 December 2010

 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 444

SUBJECT: 9 Holdsworth Avenue, St Leonards

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Tudge and Forrest that Council reaffirm its decision of 16 August 2010 to approve the proposal subject to all of the original conditions, including Conditions 2, 4, 5 & 6.

 

FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Brooks-Horn and Smith that Conditions 2, 4, 5 and part of Condition 6 be deleted, as requested by the applicant.

PROCEDURAL MOTION    

470

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Longbottom and Palmer that the Motion and the Foreshadowed Motion be debated concurrently.

 

For the Procedural Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

471

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

The Foreshadowed Motion lapsed.

 

 

Matter Arising

472

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Bennison and Longbottom that Council develop a policy note that provides conditions under which Council can depart from it DCP with regard to set-back and splay pertaining to driveways and carports / garages.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 455

SUBJECT: 43 Berry Road, St Leonards

473

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Longbottom and Smith that pursuant to the provisions of section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, as amended, the development consent D292/09 granted on 25 January 2010 for alterations and additions to existing semi-detached dwelling house on 43 Berry Road, St Leonards be amended in the following manner:-

A          Amend condition number 1 to read:-

1.    (20) That the development be strictly in accordance with drawing number 9A, 10A, 11, 12A, 13Aand 14A dated 10 October 2010 by Chris Thompson Building Design except as amended by the following conditions.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer and Smith (Total 7).

Against the Motion were Councillors Forrest and Tudge (Total 2).

 

 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 457

SUBJECT: 43A Berry Road, St Leonards

474

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Longbottom and Smith that pursuant to the provisions of section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, as amended, the development consent D293/09 granted on 25 January 2010 for alterations and additions to existing semi-detached dwelling house on 43A Berry Road, St Leonards be amended in the following manner:

A          Amend condition number 1 as under:-

1.       (20) That the development be strictly in accordance with drawing number 4, 9A, 10A, 11, 12A, 13A and 14A dated 10 October 2010 by Chris Thompson Building Design except as amended by the following conditions.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer and Smith (Total 7).

Against the Motion were Councillors Forrest and Tudge (Total 2).

 

 

Matter Arising

475

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Bennison that a report be prepared for Council with regards to extending the notification period for Development Applications received during the Christmas period.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 


 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 473

SUBJECT: 16 Greenwich Road, Greenwich

476

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Longbottom that Council refuse the development application for the following reasons:-

  1. The proposal is contrary to the public interest in that a substantial number of objections to the proposal were received;
  2. The proposal will have an adverse impact on the amenity of the surrounding residential properties specifically drainage, parking, privacy, loss of solar access, noise and a number of other matters;
  3. The proposed built form is out of keeping with the character of the area;
  4. The proposal does not fulfil the aims of the SEPP;
  5. The proposal provides inadequate washdown facilities in the garbage storage area; and
  6. The proposal has an adverse impact on the Anglo Rd streetscape particularly in regard to the four nearby heritage listed sites in that small street.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Matter Arising

477

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Tudge that Council write to the Minister requesting a review of SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 to improve the design guidelines for boarding houses in order to better promote such affordable housing in the community.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Procedural Motion

478

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Longbottom and Smith that voting on the parts of the Recommendation for the Local Environmental Plan 12 Month Review – Supplementary Report be dealt with ad-seriatim.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 49

SUBJECT: LEP 12-month review - supplementary report

479

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Forrest that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1a)  Retain the existing zoning and scale of i) 194 – 206 Pacific Highway;

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

480

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Longbottom and Bennison that Council resolve in relation to the LEP that the zoning of 1a) (ii) Birdwood Avenue properties and specifically 15-17 Birdwood Avenue, be deferred to allow for a review of the zoning within the whole of Birdwood Ave.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy and Smith (Total 6).

Against the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Palmer and Tudge (Total 3).

481

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Brooks-Horn that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

 1a)  Retain the existing zoning and scale of iii) 1A Burley St.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

482

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Forrest that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1b)   Amend the scale of the R4 zone on the north side of Longueville Road (Nos. 11-47) to a height to 18 metres and FSR of 2:1, with height of 25 metres and FSR of 2:1 for 2-4 Burley Street

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Tudge and Mcilroy that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1c)  In relation to 150 Epping Road, advise the Minister:-

i)     of Council’s support for Light Industrial IN2 zoning;

ii)    that if, alternatively, Mixed Use proceeds, Council supports a maximum height of 39 metres and FSR of 1.1:1 over the site as a whole; and

iii)    that Environmental Protection should apply to the eastern bushland handle of approximately 1.35 hectares.




 

 

FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Longbottom and Smith that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1c)  In relation to 150 Epping Road, advise the Minister:-

i)     of Council’s support for Mixed Use zoning with a maximum height of 39 metres and FSR of 1.1:1 over the site as a whole; and

ii)    that Environmental Protection should apply to the eastern bushland handle of approximately 1.35 hectares.

483

 Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

The Foreshadowed Motion lapsed.

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Tudge and Forrest that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1d) In relation the Mowbray/ Stringybark precinct, clarify Resolution No.386 of 18 October 2010 as follows:-

·         That the area bounded by Mowbray Rd, Centennial Ave, Willandra St and Stringybark Creek bush reserve be zoned in accordance with Map A tabled at this meeting, including Nos. 1-15 centennial Ave to be Medium Density Residential R3.

 

FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Smith and Bennison that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1d)         In relation the Mowbray/ Stringybark precinct, clarify Resolution No.386 of 18 October 2010 as follows:-

·         That the area bounded by Mowbray Rd, Centennial Ave, Willandra St and Stringybark Creek bush reserve be zoned in accordance with Map B tabled at this meeting, including Nos. 1-15 Centennial Ave to be High Density Residential R4.

484

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared carried

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

The Foreshadowed Motion lapsed.

485

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Mcilroy that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1e)   In relation to the Marshall precinct, Council discuss with the Department appropriate options to achieve Council’s original intentions, including minimising impacts from developments south of Pacific Hwy on residences south of Marshall Ave.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

486

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Forrest that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1f)     Apply a ‘foreshore scenic protection area’ to the LEP to correspond with the Sydney Harbour Regional Environmental Plan boundary.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

487

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Mcilroy that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1g)    Omit access handles from FSR and site area calculations for battleaxe blocks.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

488

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Smith that Council resolve in relation to the LEP to:-

1h)    Discuss with the Dept of Planning, and other relevant authorities, controls to permit such uses of the air space above the rail line near St Leonards station as open space, cafes, bus interchanges etc.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

489

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Brooks-Horn and Tudge that:-

2.      Council submit the LEP with adopted amendments from this meeting, together with those from 18 October 2010 and 1 November 2010, in a planning proposal to the Department of Planning LEP Gateway, requesting approval to proceed to exhibition.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

490

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Brooks-Horn and Tudge that:-

3.      Community Consultation be undertaken for 6 weeks in accordance with the strategy outlined in this report, not prior to February 2011.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

491

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Palmer that:-

4.      Council receive a further report outlining the results of the Community Consultation.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

Orders Of The Day

 

Order Of The Day No. 29

SUBJECT: Division of Local Govenrment - Councillor Information Sessions

492

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Gaffney that the report be received and noted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Order Of The Day No. 30

SUBJECT: Council and Committee Meeting Schedule - February 2011 

493

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Smith that the Council and Committee Meeting Schedule for February 2011 be adopted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Notices of Motion

 

Notice of Motion No. 13

SUBJECT: Proposal for the Declaration of Wildlife Protection Areas

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Forrest and Mcilroy that:-

1.      Council supports the provision of the initial funding (estimated $9,800) this financial year in order to employ a consultant to undertake the necessary work for the consideration of the introduction of Wildlife Protection Areas in Lane Cove in accordance with the Lane Cove Bushland Plan of Management 2007; and

2.      Consultation with Aboriginal elders be undertaken in regards to the introduction of Wildlife Protection Areas in Lane Cove.

 

AMENDMENT

An Amendment was moved by Councillors Bennison and Brooks-Horn that:-

1.            The matter be deferred to the Corporate Planning Weekend for further discussion; and

2.            A report be prepared for Council to discuss which includes information regarding:-

a)      Which areas specifically are proposed to be declared (WPAs);

b)      What is the legal jurisdiction for WPA legislation;

c)      Impact and/or restrictions on residents as to their accessibility of area declared WPA;

d)      Impact and/or restrictions to pet owners to area declared WPA;

e)      Impact to business that use areas proposed to be declared WPA;  

f)        What are the implications if any to the Bushfire Management Plan; and

g)      General – what are the restrictions on area that are declared WPA.

 

 

 

Upon being put to the meeting the Amendment was declared lost.

For the Amendment were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

Against the Amendment were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

494

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

 

 

Matter Arising

495

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Tudge that:-

1.            The introduction of Wildlife Protection Areas in Lane Cove be discussed at the Corporate Planning Weekend or a subsequent Councillors Workshop; and

2.            Discussion on the matter include the following issues:-

a)      Which areas specifically are proposed to be declared (WPAs);

b)      What is the legal jurisdiction for WPA legislation;

c)      Impact and/or restrictions on residents as to their accessibility of area declared WPA;

d)      Impact and/or restrictions to pet owners to area declared WPA;

e)      Impact to business that use areas proposed to be declared WPA;  

f)        What are the implications if any to the Bushfire Management Plan; and

g)      General – what are the restrictions on area that are declared WPA.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Notice of Motion No. 14

SUBJECT: Parking PODS

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Brooks-Horn and Smith that:-

1.      The General Manager prepares a report for Council about the Parking PODs in Lane Cove.  This report is to contain but not be limited to:-

a)   The intended utilisation of the currently deployed PODs;

b)   The intended future utilisation of PODs throughout the Lane Cove Municipality;

c)   The current cost of the current and future deployment including: PODs, relays, computer systems, hand held equipments etc; and installation costs;

d)   Expected revenue by fines;

e)   The public consultation used before the current deployment; and

f)    The intended public notification.

2.      The currently deployed PODs only be used for information gathering purposes and not for parking enforcement until the report is presented to Council and the future of the PODs is decided by Council.

3.      No further PODs be deployed until points 1 and 2 are completed.

 


 

 

FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Palmer and Tudge that Council endorse the deployment of Parking PODs in line with the recommendations contained in the Lane Cove Town Centre Parking Master Plan (adopted by Council 3 March 2008).

 

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared lost.

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

Against the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

 

496

The Foreshadowed Motion became the Motion.

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

 

 

Matter Arising

497

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Forrest and Smith that Council use all available resources to advertise to the community the implementation of parking PODs in Lane Cove Village including a press release, information pamphlet, notice on Council’s website and in Councils newsletter.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Notice of Motion No. 16

SUBJECT: Commercial Waste Removal

498

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Bennison and Smith that the matter be deferred for consideration at the Corporate Planning Weekend in February 2011.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

General Managers Reports

 

General Managers Report No. 20

SUBJECT: Proposed Closure Friedlander Place, St Leonards

499

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Brooks-Horn that Council, having considered the issues raised in the submissions and/or objections received in relation to the proposal to close Friedlander Place, St Leonards as outlined in this report, request the Department of Lands to approve the road closure and effect gazettal, noting that:-

1.       Valid requirements raised by Energy Australia requiring an easement over their infrastructure have been included in the S88B instrument;

2.       Valid requirements raised by adjacent land owners currently having access of Friedlander Place requiring rights of way over the existing road pavement have been addressed by Rights of Way and appropriate provisions included in the S88B instrument;

 

3.       The responsibility for ongoing maintenance of the proposed road lot will transfer to the owner of the proposed road lot.  Until the land is sold, that responsibility remains with Council;

4.       A public pathway will be provided between Nicholson Street and Pacific Highway, with provision in the S88B instrument to effect its relocation to suit a future redevelopment; and

5.       The RTA has recommended concurrence with the proposed road closure.

Councillor Mcilroy left the meeting at 10:25pm.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom,  Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 8).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

Absent was Councillor Mcilroy (Total 1)

 

Councillor Mcilroy rejoined the meeting at 10:28pm.

 

Councillor Longbottom reaffirmed his declaration of interest and left the Council Chamber.

 

General Managers Report No. 22

SUBJECT: Code of Conduct matter - Clr Ian Longbottom

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Brooks-Horn and Smith that Council:-

1.      Note that a breach of the Code of Conduct occurred;

2.      Note that an apology has been made and unanimously accepted by Council and take no further action on this matter as recommended by the Sole Reviewer; and

3.            Provide Mr Shaw’s report to any future Code of Conduct Review Committee should such a body be called upon to investigate a similar breach by the Councillor.

 

AMENDMENT

An Amendment was moved by Councillors Tudge and Forrest that:-

1.            Council note that a breach of the Code of Conduct occurred;

2.            Council note that an apology has been made and unanimously accepted by Council and take no further action on this matter as recommended by the Sole Reviewer;

3.            Council provide Mr Shaw’s report to any future Code of Conduct Review Committee should such a body be called upon to investigate a similar breach by the Councillor; and

4.            The Report be tabled subject to there being no legal ramifications. 

 

Upon being put to the meeting the Amendment was declared lost.

For the Amendment were Councillors Forrest, Palmer and Tudge (Total 3).

Against the Amendment were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Mcilroy and Smith (Total 5).

Absent was Councillor Longbottom (Total 1).

500

Upon being put to the meeting  the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 8).

Against the Motion were Nil.

Absent was Councillor Longbottom (Total 1).

 

Councillor Longbottom rejoined the meeting at 10:35pm.

 

Corporate Services Division Reports

 

Corporate Services Division Report No. 66

SUBJECT: Infrastructure Levy - Background and Way Forward

501

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Mcilroy that:-

1.   The report be received and noted;

2.   Council apply under s508A of the Local Government Act 1993 to implement a 7.5% (Nett 6%) special variation on all rateable properties for a seven year period; and

3.   A plan for expenditure of the levy be developed for Council.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

Corporate Services Division Report No. 69

SUBJECT: Revised Internal Audit Committee Charter

502

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Palmer that Council adopt the revised Internal Audit Committee Charter as endorsed by the Internal Audit Committee on the 27th October 2010.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Open Space and Urban Services Division Reports

 

Open Space and Urban Services Division Report No. 52

SUBJECT: Lloyd Rees Bandstand Heritage Upgrades

503

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Forrest and Smith that:-

1.      Council adopt the Lloyd Rees Bandstand Heritage Upgrade Preliminary Plans, LCP-DD-01A and LCP-DD-02A, shown as AT-10 and AT-11 as prepared by staff and dated 1 December 2010.

2.      Detailed design plans and documentation be prepared to proceed to the tender assessment stage for the heritage upgrade of the Lloyd Rees Bandstand and Forecourt.

3.      Council receive a report back at the tender assessment stage to allow authorisation of a suitably qualified contractor to undertake the upgrade works for the Lloyd Rees Bandstand and Forecourt area.

4.      Mr Graham Edds (Heritage Architect) be retained, subject to a reasonable price being provided, to undertake further heritage review of the Bandstand through the detailed design process, and then to provide relevant heritage input through the construction stage of the project. In the event the price of Mr Edds is not considered reasonable, a further report be submitted to Council for consideration.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Matter Arising

504

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Forrest and Tudge that the Bandstand Working Party continue to be consulted throughout the design and construction phase of the Bandstand Upgrade.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Environmental Services Division Reports

 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 45

SUBJECT: Business Use of Footpath Policies

505

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Gaffney that:-

1.   Council adopt the draft Street Vending and the draft Footpath Dining policies for the purposes of public exhibition for a period of 12 weeks in accordance with the consultation strategy outlined in the report; and

2.   At the conclusion of the public exhibition period, a report be submitted to Council that outlines the submissions received and makes appropriate observations and recommendations for Council’s consideration.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 50

SUBJECT: Delegated Authority Report - November 2010

506

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Smith that the report be received and noted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Procedural Motion

507

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Brooks-Horn the voting on the parts of the Recommendation for DCP 12 Month Review – Priority Issues be dealt with ad-seriatim.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

Environmental Services Division Report No. 48

SUBJECT: DCP 12-month Review - Priority Issues

508

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Bennison that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.1     Tree preservation: in accordance with legal advice, as shown at AT-1.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Mcilroy and Forrest that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.2     Car parking:-

(i)    Residential parking for residential flat buildings, and the residential component of mixed use developments, within 400 metres of the Lane Cove Village and St Leonards Station to be reduced to:-

·      1 space per studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units

·      1.5 spaces per 3+ -bedroom units

 

FIRST FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Longbottom and Brooks-Horn that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.2     Car parking:-

(i)    Residential parking for residential flat buildings, and the residential component of mixed use developments, within 400 metres of the Lane Cove Village and St Leonards Station to be reduced to:-

·         1 space per studio and 1-bedroom

·         2 space per 2-bedroom unit

·         2 spaces per 3+ -bedroom units

 

SECOND FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Second Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Palmer and Smith that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.2     Car parking:-

(i)   Residential parking for residential flat buildings, and the residential component of mixed use developments, within 400 metres of the Lane Cove Village and St Leonards Station remain as per the current DCP, that is:-

·         0.5 space per studio

·         1 space per 1-bedroom

·         1.5 space per 2-bedroom unit

·         2 spaces per 3+ -bedroom units

 

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared lost.

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Mcilroy and Tudge (Total 3).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Longbottom, Palmer and Smith (Total 6).

 

The First Foreshadowed Motion became the Motion. 

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared lost.

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Longbottom and Smith (Total 4).

Against the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Gaffney, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 5).

 

509

The Second Foreshadowed Motion became the Motion.

Upon being put to the meeting  the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

510

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Brooks-Horn and Smith that:-

1. The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.2    Car parking:-

(ii)  Visitor parking:-

·     General areas: 1 visitor car space per 4 dwellings

·     1-5 Little Lane: Confirm the current : none

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

511

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Gaffney and Smith that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.2    Car parking:-

(iii)  Accessible spaces provision to require “1 accessible parking space (of dimensions in accordance with relevant Australian Standards) is required for each adaptable housing unit within the total calculation of spaces required for that dwelling”.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

 

MOTION

A Motion was moved by Councillors Tudge and Forrest that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.2    Car parking:-

(iv)              Amend the commercial car parking rate in St Leonards to 1 space per 400m2 floor space, for the purpose of exhibition, pending traffic study investigation of the parking needs and opportunities for increasing underground public car parking.

 

FORESHADOWED MOTION

A Foreshadowed Motion was moved by Councillors Longbottom and Brooks-Horn that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

(iv)              Amend the commercial car parking rate in St Leonards to 1 space per 200m2 floor space, for the purpose of exhibition, pending traffic study investigation of the parking needs and opportunities for increasing underground public car parking.

 

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared lost.

For the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 4).

Against the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Longbottom and Smith (Total 5).

 

512

The Foreshadowed Motion became the Motion.

Upon being put to the meeting the Motion was declared carried.

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Gaffney, Longbottom and Smith (Total 5).

Against the Motion were Councillors Forrest, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 4).

513

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Gaffney that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.3     Replace Diagram 5 in Part C to electronically reflect the sketch in the former Dwelling House Code.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

514

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Bennison that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.4     Provide one consistent set of solar access controls for all residential developments, including those within mixed use development, as shown at AT 2.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

515

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Tudge and Gaffney that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.5    In relation to outbuildings and garages, (i) include garages within the controls for outbuildings to align with the BCA, and  (ii) permit outbuildings to a maximum area of 50m2.

 

Councillors Bennison and Smith left the meeting at 11:18pm.

For the Motion were Councillors Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 7).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

Absent were Councillors Bennison and Smith (Total 2)

516

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Mcilroy that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.6     Clause B.3.1 be amended to permit Council to refuse a residential development which would create an isolated site, according to the circumstances of a situation.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer and Tudge (Total 7).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

Absent were Councillors Bennison and Smith (Total 2)

 

Councillors Smith and Bennison rejoined the meeting at 11:22pm.

Councillor Brooks-Horn left the meeting at 11:22pm.

517

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Tudge that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.7     Amend DCP to state that:

In residential flat buildings, including residential apartments in mixed use buildings, the floor to ceiling height shall be:-

·      For non-habitable rooms, a preferred minimum of 2.4m, however a minimum of 2.25m will be permitted;

·      For the upper level of a 2 level apartment, a minimum of 2.4m provided at least 50% of the apartment has a minimum of 2.7m height; and

·      For all single level apartments, a minimum of 2.7m.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 8).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

Absent was Councillor Brooks-Horn (Total 1).

 

Councillor Brooks-Horn rejoined the meeting at 11:23pm.

 


 

518

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Palmer that:-  

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.8     In relation to 1-5 Little Street, omit clause 4.8 requiring common open space.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

519

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Palmer and Smith that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.9    In relation to 1-5 Little Street’s community facilities, clarify that the floor area calculation excludes the public foyer but may include facilities, such as toilets, intended principally for users of that community area.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

520

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Mcilroy and Bennison that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.10   In relation to 1-5 Little Street, references to street activation are not to apply to Little Street (but are to remain for Little Lane), while still aiming to minimise visual impacts there through such means as public art and landscaping.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

521

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Brooks-Horn that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.11  In relation to 1-5 Little Street, amend Part O - Stormwater Management so that the requirements for this site’s residential components relating to freeboard construction are to apply also to its non-residential areas.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 


 

522

 

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Brooks-Horn that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.12   In relation to 1-5 Little Street, clarify that the carpark and podium are permissible above ground between the boundary and the setback applying to the remainder of the building, but that the design should have regard to amenity issues particularly visual viewed from the adjoining property to the south and from the public domain.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

523

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Palmer that:-

1.       The following draft amendments to the DCP be adopted for the purpose of public exhibition:-

1.13  Amend Part O – Stormwater, Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3, as shown in AT-2.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

524

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Brooks-Horn that:-

2.       Place the draft DCP amendments on public exhibition for a period of 8 weeks in accordance with the Consultation Strategy outlined in the report.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

525

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Brooks-Horn that:-  

3.       Upon conclusion of the exhibition period, a report be prepared detailing issues, comments and appropriate recommendations.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Human Services Division Reports

 

Human Services Division Report No. 35

SUBJECT: Using Technology to Reach Library Borrowers

526

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Brooks-Horn and Smith that:-

1.      The report be received and noted; and

2.      Council thank dedicated volunteer Pat Silman for her assistance with the Local Studies’ wiki.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

  

ORDER OF THE DAY No. 31

527

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Forrest and Tudge that Council express congratulations to Lyndall McNally of the Lane Cove Youth Orchestra for her recent work with seniors in the Lane Cove Community.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

SERVICES AND resources committee

 

General Managers Reports

 

General Managers Report No. 21

SUBJECT: Monthly Review for October 2010

528

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Mcilroy that the report be received and noted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

Corporate Services Division Reports

 

Corporate Services Division Report No. 70

SUBJECT: Statement of Investments as at 30 November 2010

529

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Bennison that the report “Statement of Investments as at 30th November 2010” be received and noted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

Corporate Services Division Report No. 71

SUBJECT: Legal Expenses for November  2010

530

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Palmer that the Legal Expenses for November 2010 be received and noted.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

Open Space and Urban Services Division Reports

 

Open Space and Urban Services Division Report No. 51

SUBJECT: The Lane Cove Traffic Committee held Tuesday 16 November 2010

531

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Smith and Mcilroy that Council receive and note the recommendations of the Lane Cove Traffic Committee Meeting of Tuesday 16 November 2010.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Open Space and Urban Services Division Report No. 50

SUBJECT: Lane Cove Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting held Tuesday 14 September 2010

532

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Brooks-Horn and Mcilroy that Council receive and note the recommendations of the Lane Cove Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting of Tuesday 14 September 2010.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

 

 

Open Space and Urban Services Division Report No. 53

SUBJECT: Lane Cove Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting held Tuesday 16 November 2010

533

RESOLVED on the motion of Councillors Brooks-Horn and Tudge that Council receive and note the recommendations of the Lane Cove Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting of Tuesday 16 November 2010.

 

For the Motion were Councillors Bennison, Brooks-Horn, Forrest, Gaffney, Longbottom, Mcilroy, Palmer, Smith and Tudge (Total 9).

Against the Motion was Nil (Total 0).

  

CLOSE

 

The meeting closed at 11:34pm.

 

Confirmed at the Ordinary Council Meeting of 7th February 2011, at which meeting the signature herein is subscribed.

 

 

MAYOR

 

 

********* END OF MINUTES *********