Lane Cove Council
Ordinary
Council
AGENDA
DATE OF MEETING: 3 September 2007
LOCATION: Council Chambers
TIME: 6.30pm. Note. If members of the public are not
interested in any business recommended by the General Manager to be considered
in Closed Session or there is no such business, Council will ordinarily
commence consideration of all other business at
Meetings held in the Council Chambers are recorded on tape
for the purposes of verifying the accuracy of minutes and the tapes are not
disclosed to any third party under section 12(6) of the Local Government Act,
except as allowed under section 18(1) or section 19(1) of the PPIP Act, or
where Council is compelled to do so by court order, warrant or subpoena or by
any other legislation.
Lane Cove Council business papers and minutes
are available on Council’s website www.lanecove.nsw.gov.au.
ORDINARY COUNCIL |
|
3
SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
DECLARATIONS
OF INTEREST
APOLOGIES
OPENING
OF MEETING WITH PRAYER
MATTERS RECOMMENDED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER TO BE
CONSIDERED IN CLOSED COMMITTEE
Confidential Items
1. General Managers Report No. 24
SUBJECT: Lane
It is recommended that the Council close so much of
the meeting to the public as provided for under Section 10A(2) (d) of the Local
Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains commercial
information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the
commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial
advantage on a competitor of the council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret; it
further being considered that discussion of the matter in open meeting would
be, on balance, contrary to public interest by reason of the foregoing.
2. Human Services Division Report No. 20
SUBJECT: Lane Cove Aquatic Leisure Centre
It is recommended that the Council close so much of
the meeting to the public as provided for under Section 10A(2) (g) of the Local
Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains advice concerning
litigation, or advice as comprises a discussion of this matter, that would
otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of
legal professional privilege; it further being considered that discussion of
the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to public interest by
reason of the foregoing.
SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS
Council at its meeting of the 13th
May 1996, resolved in part that:
At the first meeting (first Monday) of
each month, people who wish to address Council on any matter in a report on the
agenda for that meeting (for a maximum of three minutes) be allowed to do so at
the conclusion of Closed Committee or if there is no Closed Committee at the
commencement of the meeting.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
3. ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 20
AUGUST 2007
Referred Reports
4. Environmental Services Division Report
No. 27
SUBJECT: 10, 12, 12A Poole Street, Longueville
Inspection Committee at its meeting on 01 September 2007 resolved that the matter be referred to the Ordinary Council
meeting to be held on 03 September 2007
Orders Of The Day
5. Order Of The Day No. 17
SUBJECT: Meeting in the Plaza - Saturday 29 September
2007
Corporate Services Division Reports
6. Corporate Services Division Report No. 44
SUBJECT: Annual Financial Reports for 2006/2007 -
Referral for Audit
Environmental Services Division Reports
7. Environmental Services Division Report
No. 21
SUBJECT: Draft Inner North Subregional Strategy
8. Environmental Services Division Report No. 24
SUBJECT: 16 Taleeban Road Riverview
9. Environmental Services Division Report No. 25
SUBJECT:
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
***** END OF AGENDA *****
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION REPORT NO.
27 |
|
3 SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Ordinary Council
at the Meeting 3 September
2007
29/08/2007 to Ordinary Council
Environmental Services Division Report No. 27
Subject: 10, 12, 12A
Inspection Committee
at its meeting on 01 September 2007 resolved that the matter be referred to the Ordinary Council
meeting to be held on 03 September 2007
Record No: DA06/388-01 - 24672/07
Author(s): May Li
Property: 10,
12 & 12A
DA No: 388/2006
Date Lodged: 22
December 2006
Cost of Work: $5,500,000.00
Owner : D Fite & D Lowes
Author: May
Li
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPOSAL TO APPEAR ON DETERMINATION |
Demolition of all
existing structures including a heritage item except an in-ground swimming
pool at 10 Poole Street, construction of two detached dwelling houses and
associated structures, consolidation and boundary adjustment |
ZONE |
2(a2) – Residential |
IS THE PROPOSAL
PERMISSIBLE WITHIN THE ZONE? |
Yes |
IS THE PROPERTY A
HERITAGE ITEM? |
Yes. |
IS THE PROPERTY
WITHIN A CONSERVATION AREA? |
No. However,
the subject site is located in vicinity to other heritage items: |
DOES DCP 1-
BUSHLAND APPLY TO THE PROPERTY? |
No |
BCA CLASSIFICATION |
Class 1a, 10a and 10b |
STOP THE CLOCK USED |
Yes - 182 days |
NOTIFICATION |
Neighbours Ward Councillors A
Smith, K Freedman, & J Hassarati Progress Association Longueville
Residents Association The development proposal was also advertised on
North Shore Times newspaper in January 2007. |
REASON FOR REFERRAL:
The development application has been called by
Councillor Smith and Freedman due to the land use concerns.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The proposed
development involves demolition of all existing structures including a heritage
item at
The existing dwelling
house known as Derwent House located at
The existing dwelling
house with an in-ground swimming pool located at
The design of the
proposed dwelling houses does not comply with the Lane Cove Code for Dwelling
Houses relating to cut and fill, floor space ratio, and the set back of above
ground swimming pool requirements.
15 of 16 submissions
received relating to the proposed development raised objections to demolition
of the heritage building. The owners of
the adjoining properties of 1 and
The potential loss of
an identified heritage item of significance to the Lane Cove area must be
actively considered by Council as a separate issue to the merit of the proposed
structures. The proposed development in its current format is not supported.
SITE:
The subject site is
located at the southern side of
It comprises the
following titles:
Lots 1 & 2, DP
333694 is known as
The land falls
gradually from
Surrounding
developments comprise dwelling houses and the
Refer to AT1 for the Neighbour Notification Plan
of the site.
PROPOSAL:
The
proposal is detailed as follows:
- Demolition
of all existing structures including the heritage item, except the in-ground
swimming pool at
- Consolidation of the land of 10 and
12A
- A boundary adjustment between 10 and
- Construction
of a dwelling house on the consolidation land of 10 and 12A
The northern pavilion would be a three storey structure containing a
play room, terrace, a sculpture pool and storage rooms on the lower ground
level; an arrive podium, laundry, guest room and linen storage room on the
ground level, gym, steam room, massage, two offices, a library, a bar and
toilets on the first floor level.
The centre pavilion would be a two storey structure containing a family
room and kitchen on the lower ground level, 4 bedrooms with bathrooms and
gallery on the ground level.
The southern pavilion would be a two storey structure with basement
containing three parking spaces, cellar, plant room, store, lift and water
tanks storage area on the basement level, foyer area, covered decks, bar
cellar, sitting room, dining room/library and reflection pool on the ground
level, master bedroom with bathrooms, sitting room, walk-in robes, bar and a
32m length above ground lap swimming pool on the first floor.
The gross floor area of the dwelling house at
- Construction
of a dwelling house on 12 Poole Street containing a squash court, storage and a
toilet on the lower ground level; an entry, two bedrooms, living room, and a
bathroom on the ground floor, two bedrooms with bathrooms on the first floor.
There is no on site parking provision proposed for the dwelling house
within the boundaries of
The gross floor area of the dwelling house is approximately 319m2 and the FSR is 0.51:1.
Refer
to AT2 for the architectural plans
of the proposed development.
PREVIOUS APPROVALS/HISTORY:
There has been no
previous development applications lodged for 10 and 12A
Development
Application No. 160/1999 for demolition of the existing dwelling house and
construction of a new two storey dwelling house at
PROPOSAL
DATA/POLICY COMPLIANCE:
The dwelling house at 10 and 12A
Total site area of 3819.8m2 including of 202.88m2
access handle area. The calculations for
floor space and site area have excluded the whole width of the access
handle.
Site Area (3566.92m2)
|
PROPOSED |
CODE |
COMPLIES |
Floor Space Ratio (max) |
0.52:1 |
0.5:1 |
No |
Soft Landscaped Area (min) |
39% |
35% |
Yes |
Side Boundary Setback (min) |
1.5m |
1.5m |
Yes |
Overall Height (m) (max) |
7.7m |
9.5m |
Yes |
Ceiling Height (m) (max) |
7.0m |
7.0m |
Yes |
No of Storeys |
3 However, the lower ground
level is under the natural ground level |
2 from natural level |
Yes |
Building Line (max) |
N/A |
7.5m |
N/A |
|
The proposed dwelling house is
17m away from the foreshore setback line established by line drawn from two
adjoining neighbouring developments. The new pool shed is proposed
at the same location of the existing pool shed. |
Foreshore Setback line
established by line drawn from neighbouring development |
Yes |
Cut and Fill (max) |
3.7m |
1m |
No |
Deck/Balcony width (max) |
3m |
3m (if elevated by >1m) |
Yes |
Solar Access (min) |
The proposed building does not
shadow any of the north facing windows of the adjoining properties by more
than 3 hours |
3 hours to north elevation |
Acceptable |
FENCING
|
PROPOSED |
CODE |
COMPLIES |
Height (max) |
884mm |
900mm |
Yes |
% Open Where > 900mm in
Height (min) |
N/A |
50% |
N/A |
Setback From Front Boundary
if >900mm in height (min) |
Nil |
1m |
N/A |
Splays |
Nil |
1m |
N/A |
SWIMMING POOLS
|
PROPOSED |
CODE |
COMPLIES |
Concourse Edge to Neighbour’s
House (min) |
More than 3m |
3m |
Yes |
Setback from boundary if
concourse is <500mm above natural ground level (min) |
N/A |
900mm from internal face of
pool 450mm from edge of concourse |
N/A |
Setback from boundary if
concourse is >500mm above natural ground level (min) |
1.6m |
900mm from edge of concourse |
Yes |
Setback from boundary if
concourse is >500mm above natural ground level and adjoins public open
space (min) |
1.6m |
1:1 setback measured from
concourse edge |
No |
Height (max) |
3.6m |
1800mm |
No |
Setback if height is >1800mm
(min) |
1.6m |
1:1 setback measured from
concourse edge |
No |
Screening of facade where >
1.0m above ground level? |
Screen proposed |
Screening required |
Yes |
The dwelling house at
Site Area (620 m2)
|
PROPOSED |
CODE |
COMPLIES |
Floor Space Ratio (max) |
0.51:1 |
0.5:1 |
No |
Soft Landscaped Area (min) |
42% |
35% |
Yes |
Side Boundary Setback (min) |
Approximately 3.2m |
1.5m |
Yes |
Overall Height (m) (max) |
8.4m |
9.5m |
Yes |
Ceiling Height (m) (max) |
6.7m |
7.0m |
Yes |
No of Storeys |
2 |
2 |
No |
Building Line (max) |
7.5m |
7.5m |
Yes |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Cut and Fill (max) |
Less than 1m |
1m |
Yes |
Deck/Balcony width (max) |
1m |
3m (if elevated by >1m) |
Yes |
Solar Access (min) |
The proposed building does not
shadow any of the north facing windows of the adjoining properties by more
than 3 hours |
3 hours to north elevation |
Acceptable |
FENCING
|
PROPOSED |
CODE |
COMPLIES |
Height (max) |
884mm |
900mm |
Yes |
% Open Where > 900mm in
Height (min) |
N/A |
50% |
N/A |
Setback From Front Boundary
if >900mm in height (min) |
Nil |
1m |
N/A |
Splays |
Nil |
1m |
N/a |
REFERRALS:
Manager Urban Design and Assets
The
proposed development was referred to Council’s Development Engineer for
comment. The Development Engineer states
that there is no objection raised to the proposed development relating to the
stormwater management of the site.
Manager Open Space
The
proposed development was referred to Council’s Manager of Open Space for
comment. No objections have been raised
relating to the proposed landscaping plans.
Other (Heritage, Traffic,
Waterways, Rural Fire Service)
As
discussed in the previous section of this report,
· Council’s Heritage
Advisor
Council’s heritage advisor does not support the demolition of the
heritage item and stated that the building is an unusual example of the
architectural style of the period, reflecting the development of Longueville
and contributes to the Lane Cove riverscape.
Refer to AT3 for the heritage
advice.
· NSW Heritage Council
The NSW Heritage Council does not support the demolition of the heritage
item and has stated that the residence is an imposing, architect-designed
building, visible from the Harbour, purpose-designed to take advantage of all
views and is intact. In this instance,
the Heritage Council recommended that Lane Cove Council considers alternatives
to the demolition of this locally significant building. Refer to AT4
for the comment of NSW Heritage Council.
NSW
Maritime
The
development proposal was referred to NSW Maritime as an integrated
development. The NSW Maritime stated
that the applicant is required to make a separate application for the Part 3A
Permit to NSW Maritime if Council grants development consent and before any
physical works are commenced at the site.
Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act)
The Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act contains objectives for the carrying out of
development. The proposal does not meet
the following objective:
5 Objects
The objects of this
Act are:
(vii) ecologically
sustainable development
The
proposed development involves demolition of a building of heritage value of
local significance and a building that is structurally sound and intact at
The
existing dwelling house at
The
applicant has recently lodged an ecologically sustainable design (ESD) report
for supporting the demolition of the existing buildings. It is noted that the ESD only provided an
analysis between the energy efficiency of three existing dwelling houses and
the proposed two dwelling houses. It did not provided an analysis of energy
efficiency of the existing dwelling house and the proposed dwelling house at
Lane Cove LOCAL Environmental Plan 1987 (Section 79C
(1) (a)
2 Aims, Objectives etc
(1) to preserve and where appropriate
improve the existing character and environmental quality of the land to which
it applies in accordance with the indicated expectations of the community, and
The proposed
development involves demolition of a heritage listed building which will create
a loss of heritage value to the local government area.
The combined area of
the car park and the water tanks storage area on the basement level is
appropriately 600m2. The excavation of the land for the
construction of the basement area and the lower ground level of the north
pavilion of the main house would create a significant impact on the land form
of the subject site and the adjoining properties. The proposed development is unlikely to
preserve the environmental quality of the locality.
It is therefore
considered that the proposal is contrary to Clause 2(1) of the aims and
objectives of the LEP.
18A Protection of heritage
items, heritage conservation areas and relics
(2) When determining a development
application required by this clause, the Council must take into consideration
the extent to which the carrying out of the proposed development would affect
the heritage significance of the heritage item or heritage conservation.
The Heritage Study of
the
Officer’s comment:
Given the above
comments, it is considered that the proposed development does not comply with
the aims and objectives of the Lane Cove LEP and is contrary to Clause 18A of
the LEP.
Other Planning Instruments
Lane Cove Residential
Zones Development Control Plan
Lane Cove Residential
Zones Development Control Plan sets requirements for the development of
residential zoned land in Lane Cove.
Part II – Development
in Foreshore Areas and Part VII – Residential Subdivision of the DCP applies to
the proposed development. The proposed
development complies with the Foreshore setback and the minimum lot size
requirements of the DCP.
Lane Cove Code for
Dwelling Houses, Fences, Private Swimming Pools and Outbuildings (The Code)
Lane Cove Code for
Dwelling Houses applies to the site and provides development standards for the
proposal.
3. Design, Density and Streetscape
3.1 General
Objectives:
a. Dwelling be designed with regard to
site conditions so as to minimum their impact on the landform.
b. Dwelling blend into natural landscape.
c. Dwelling designs have regard to the
amenity of adjoining properties.
Standards:
1. A minimum of cut and fill on-site, limited to
no more than 1m cut or 1m of fill at any point on the site.
2. The preservation of existing trees.
The maximum cut in
the proposed development is 3.7m below the natural ground level. The proposed basement area with water tank
storage area is approximately 600m2 and the construction
of proposed development would create a significant excavation to the land. The proposed development does not comply with
the maximum cut requirement of the Code.
3.2 Floor Space Ratio
The maximum
permissible FSR for the sites is 0.5:1 in accordance with the FSR table of the
Code.
The FSR of the
dwelling house on
5. Private Swimming Pools and Spas
General Requirements:
d. The maximum height of the pool
concourse shall not exceed 1800mm at any point above natural ground level
(measured immediately below that section of the concourse). A concourse may exceed 1800mm if its edge is
setback from the boundary at a ration of 1:1.
The proposed lap
swimming pool is approximately 3.6m above the natural ground level. The concourse of the lap pool is 1.6m from
the eastern boundary of the site and the proposal does not comply with the
above requirement of the Code, which would require a 3.6m setback.
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (
The subject site is
located with the Sydney Harbour Catchment area and given the proximity to the
water frontage, is identified as being within the Foreshores and Waterways
Area.
It is considered that
the proposed development is not contrary to the Regional Environmental
Plan.
The DCP applies to
all development proposals within the Foreshores and Waterways Area identified
in SREP (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005.
The subject site is located within a foreshore area identified on the
map and therefore the DCP applies to the proposed development.
The proposed
development complies with the objectives and the provisions of the DCP.
Variations to Council’s Codes/PolicIes (seCTIONS 79c(1)(a), (1)(b),
and (1)(c)
The
non-compliances to the Code have been outlined in the compliance tables in the
previous sections of this report. The
applicant has not submitted justification for the non-compliances with
Council’s Code relating to the FSR, cut and fill and set backs.
RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION (Section 79C(1)(d)
The
development proposal was notified in accordance with Council’s notification
policy between 10 January 2007 and 1 March 2007. 16 submissions were received in response to
the notification of the development application. 15 submissions raised objections to the
proposed development and a submission supported the proposal. The issues raised in the objections can be summarised
as follows.
· Derwent House has been a landmark in Longueville. It is one of the few significant houses and
land surrounds in the area. It is of
heritage value and should be treated accordingly.
Officer’s
comment:
Derwent
House located at
· The scale of the proposed development is out of proportion
to existing homes in our neighbourhood.
Officer’s
comment:
The
dwelling house at
· We are concerned about possible commercial use of the
proposed building. There are reception
area and meeting room shown on the plans.
Officer’s
comment:
The
proposed application applies for the construction of two dwelling houses on two
proposed allotments. Dwelling houses are
permissible in 2(a2) zones in accordance with Lane Cove LEP 1987. Originally, there was a proposed meeting room
shown on the first floor plan of the dwelling house at
· Noise from air conditioners located adjacent the boundary.
Officer’s
comment:
Six
air-conditioning units are proposed for the dwelling house at
· 3 storey section of house exceeds the height controls of Council’s Code
for Dwelling Houses.
Officer’s
comment:
The
lower ground floor of the north pavilion of the dwelling house at
· The proposed development will over shadow the pool and private outdoor
space of
Officer’s
comment:
The
solar access requirement of the Code states that a portion of north facing
windows of neighbouring dwellings receive at least 3 hours sun between 9am and
3pm on 22 June. The shadow diagrams show
that the proposed development does not shadow any facing windows of the
adjoining properties by more than 3 hours.
There is no additional over shadowing to the pool and marginal early
morning over shadowing of the open space of
· The second house fronting
Officer’s
comment:
There
is no on site parking provisions proposed within the boundaries of
CONCLUSION
The
development application has been assessed in accordance with Section 79C of
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
The demolition of the heritage item will create an adverse impact on the
heritage value of the local government area and the demolition of a building completed
less than 10 years will not promote sustainable development. The scale of the proposed dwelling building
on
Executive Manager’s Comment:
A critical issue of
the application relates to the heritage significance of heritage item 13153
located at
If Council is of the
view that this heritage item is significant, it must reject the contention of
the applicant’s Heritage Impact Statement dated December 2006 that “the
building does not have technical, social or historical significance”, as
advised on the page of 36 of the applicant’s heritage statement. After determining the significance of
heritage item 13153 Council should then consider the merit of the proposed
development.
|
That That Council
as the consent authority pursuant to section 80 (1) (b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment
Act 1979 refuse consent to Development Application No.388/2006 for
demolition of three existing dwelling houses, consolidation of No.10 and 12A
with boundary adjustment for 12 Poole Street and construction of two new
dwelling houses at 10, 12 and 12A Poole Street, Longueville, for the
following reasons: 1. The proposed
demolition of heritage item 13153 located at 2. The proposed
development does not comply with the aims and the objectives of the
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and would not promote an
ecological sustainable development to Lane Cove. 3. The proposed
development does not comply with the aims and the objective of Lane Cove
Local Environmental Plan 1987. 4. The proposed
development does not comply with the aims and the provisions of Lane Cove
Code for Dwelling Houses, Fences, Private Swimming Pools and Outbuildings. 5. The amenity for the future occupants
at 6. The approval of the development
application would not serve the public interest. |
Michael Mason
Executive Manager
Environmental Services Division
AT‑1 View |
Neighbour Notification
Plan |
1 Page |
|
AT‑2 View |
Development Proposal Plans |
36 Pages |
|
AT‑3 View |
Heritage Consultant's
Report |
2 Pages |
|
AT‑4 View |
Advice from the Heritage
Council |
1 Page |
|
AT‑5 View |
Energy Efficiency
Investigation Summary |
1 Page |
|
CNL030907ES_27
***** End of Environmental Services Division
Report No. 27 *****
|
|
ORDER OF THE DAY NO. 17 |
|
3 SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Ordinary Council
at the Meeting 3 September
2007
27/08/2007 to Ordinary Council
Order Of The Day No. 17
Subject: Meeting in the Plaza
- Saturday 29 September 2007
Record No: SU1914 - 24472/07
Author(s): Myrna
Eisenhuth
Executive Summary
Councillors are next due to meet with the public in
the Plaza on Saturday 29th
September
2007 between 10.30 am and 12.00 midday.
That Councillors nominate whom they wish to attend
the “Meeting in the Plaza – Saturday 29 2007”. |
Craig Wrightson
Executive Manager
Corporate Services Division
There are no supporting documents for this report.
CNL030907OD_17
***** End of Order Of The Day No. 17 *****
|
|
CORPORATE SERVICES DIVISION REPORT NO. 44 |
|
3 SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Ordinary Council
at the Meeting 3 September
2007
21/08/2007 to Ordinary Council
Corporate Services Division Report No. 44
Subject: Annual Financial
Reports for 2006/2007 - Referral for Audit
Record No: SU772 - 23701/07
Author(s): Craig
Wrightson
Executive Summary
Council's Annual
Financial Reports for the year ended 30 June 2007 are presented for referral to
audit. A statement is required in
respect of the accounts from Council and Management in relation to the accuracy
of the accounts. It is recommended
Council sign the statement and refer the accounts for audit.
Discussion
Council's Annual Financial Reports for the year ended
30 June 2007 have been prepared and are ready to proceed for Audit. The general
purpose financial reports, special purpose financial reports and special
schedules are required to be completed and ready for audit by 31 October
following the financial year end. In
accordance with Section 413(2)(c) of the Local Government Act, Council is
required to include with the Annual Financial Reports a "Statement by
Councillors and Management" signed under resolution of Council, by the
Mayor, one other Councillor, the General Manager and the Responsible Accounting
Officer, which will allow Council's Auditor to complete the audit. A similar "Statement by Councillors and
Management" is also required for the Special Purpose Financial Reports.
Following the Audit, the Annual Financial Reports will
then be presented to Council in November, with the Auditors Report. The "Reports" to be signed plus a
copy of the Annual Financial Reports for the Year ended 30 June 2007, are
attached. In order for Council's Annual
Financial Reports for 2006/2007 to go forward for Audit the following
resolution of Council is now required.
That:- 1. In respect to Council's General Purpose
Financial Reports the following statement be provided for signature by the
Mayor, one other Councillor, the General Manager and the Responsible
Accounting Officer:- GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
30 JUNE 2007 Statement by
Councillors and Management made pursuant to section 413 (2)(C) of the Local
Government Act 1993 (as amended). The attached
General Purpose Financial Reports for the year ended 30 June 2007, have been
drawn up in accordance with:- · the
Local Government Act 1993 (as amended) and the Regulations made thereunder; · the
Australian Accounting Standards and professional pronouncements; · the
Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting; To the best of our
knowledge and belief, this Report:- · presents
fairly the Council's operating result and financial position for the year;
and · accords
with Council’s accounting and other records. We are not aware of
matter that would render this Report false or misleading in any way. 2. In respect to Council's Special
Purpose Financial Reports, the following statement be provided for signature
by the Mayor, one other Councillor, the General Manager and the Responsible
Accounting Officer:- SPECIAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL
REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE
2007 Statement by
Councillors and Management made pursuant to the Local Government Code of
Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. The attached
Special Purpose Annual Financial Reports for the year ended 30 June 2007,
have been drawn up in accordance with:- · NSW
Government Policy Statement "Application of National Competition Policy
to Local Government"; and · Department
of Local Government guidelines "Pricing & Costing for Council
Businesses: Guide to Competitive Neutrality". · The
Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting To the best of our
knowledge and belief, this report:- · Presents
fairly the Council's operating result and financial position for each of
Council’s declared
Business Activities for the year; and · accord
with Council’s Accounting and other records. We are not aware of
any matter that is false or misleading in any way. 3. Council's Annual Financial Reports
for the year ended 30 June 2007 be referred for audit by Council’s Auditors. |
|
Craig Wrightson
Executive Manager
Corporate Services Division
AT‑1 View |
Annual Financial Reports
for 2006/2007 - Referral for Audit |
62 Pages |
|
CNL030907CSD_44
***** End of Corporate Services Division Report
No. 44 *****
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION REPORT NO.
21 |
|
3 SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Ordinary Council
at the Meeting 3 September
2007
10/08/2007 to Ordinary Council
Environmental Services Division Report No. 21
Subject: Draft Inner North
Subregional Strategy
Record No: SU1447 - 22429/07
Author(s): Stephanie
Bashford; Brendan Metcalfe
Executive Summary
The Draft Inner North
Subregional Strategy was released in July for public exhibition. The purpose of
this Report is to outline the contents of the Strategy, the key issues relevant
to Lane Cove, and its relationship with other State policies and with the Draft
Lane Cove Comprehensive Local Environmental Plan (DLEP 2007).
The Report recommends
that Council make a submission on the Strategy, in particular regarding the
need for the State Government to make a commitment to provide infrastructure to
cater for the required growth, to establish a formal regional planning forum
and to provide guidelines to ensure planning consistency in the specific
location of growth between adjacent councils. A copy of the proposed submission
is at AT 1.
Background
The Draft Inner North
Subregional Strategy (INSRS) was released by the NSW Department of Planning on
18 July 2007. Copies have been made available to Councillors
separately to this report.
The Draft Strategy is
on public exhibition for two months until 17 September 2007 at each of the
Councils within the subregion. The Inner North Subregion comprises Lane Cove,
Mosman, North Sydney,
Relationships with other State policies
The Metropolitan
Strategy for
· 1.1
million new population
· 640,000
new homes
· 550,000
new jobs
Its full set of
actions is provided in Appendix 1 to the INSRS.
The NSW State Plan,
released in November 2006, provided overarching goals, including: healthy and
harmonious communities, a high quality public transport system with cycling and
pedestrian networks, improving urban environments, stimulating business
investments, providing for open space and the arts and increasing the number of
dwellings within thirty minutes travel of a Strategic Centre.
The Urban Transport
Statement also released in November 2006, proposed new infrastructure, strengthening
of eighteen transport corridors and a new Centre for Transport Planning and
Product Development.
The Contents of INSRS
The following
provides an outline of the contents of the Strategy. Matters specific to Lane
Cove are in italics.
Key Directions (page
6)
· Knowledge-based
employment: IT, communications, biomedical, education and property
· A Global
Economic Corridor from Ryde to North Sydney (and
· Knowledge
assets to be reinforced: the subregion has the highest concentration of
professional and managerial residents and workers. It is to be reinforced with
State infrastructure projects. For Lane
Cove, however, only two items are indicated: Item 25 (repairs for
· Protect
strategic employment lands: including
· Housing
choice: “sustainable and liveable communities”, new housing forms in areas of
public transport access and amenity, residential development within centres and
high quality urban form.
· Public
transport: Lane Cove Tunnel, North West
Harbour-South West Rail Link, integrated land use and transport planning.
·
Structure Plan (page
10)
· 1 Global
City (including
· 2
Specialised Centres: St Leonards in one,
· 1 Major
Centre: Chatswood
· 4 Town
Centres:
· 5
Villages: (e.g. Crows Nest)
· Numerous
neighbourhood Centres: Lane Cove has five
(
· 30,000 new
homes
· 60,000 new
jobs
Process (page 10)
· Monitoring
of actions by the Department of Planning and
Metropolitan CEOs with annual progress reports to the Minister and the
Infrastructure Planning Committee of Cabinet.
· Section
117 Directions to expand to relate, for example, to stream mapping and
biodiversity requirements for future LEP drafting
· The final
Strategy to represent an agreed State Government position on Inner North
planning
· Lane Cove’s job target is 6,500 (the other
five councils targets are on page 24)
· 8,200 new jobs in St Leonards, preferably
A-grade commercial
· Lane Cove (65 hectares) and
· High-tech,
business park expansion across subregion
· Limited
land supply, with loss of 187 hectares in 19 years, so rezoning is restricted.
· These
categories of industrial lands (page 26):-
- land to be retained: including Lane Cove West
- land with potential for a wider range of
employment use:
- land that could be investigated for
alternative uses:
· Transport
infrastructure (TUTA) will affect
economic future
Centres and Corridors
(page 36)
· The hierarchy
of centres in shown on pages 38-41 and is described above.
· The Lane
Cove Town Centre is described on page 50.
· Local
centres renewal in encouraged: Lane Cove
Alive project supports this.
Housing (page 58)
· Lane
Cove’s housing target is 3,900 new dwellings (the other five council’s targets
are shown on page 63).
· The
subregions dwelling target of 30,000 would be 6.7% of
· This
growth rate would be 1,100 dwellings per year, lower that the 1,800 per year
over the past ten years in the subregion.
· The
proportion of detached houses is 42%, including
in Lane Cove, compared with 60% in
· Townhouses,
villas and dual occupancies are 20%, contrasted
with only 6% in Lane Cove, and are encouraged.
· Housing
targets are to have annual and 5 yearly reviews.
· 80% of
dwellings to be within 30 minutes travel by public transport of a Strategic
Centre: Lane Cove has high compliance.
· Affordable
housing is being investigated by the NSW Affordable Housing Interdepartmental
Committee. The State Government remains committed to a strong social housing
sector: The Lane Cove DLEP 2007 includes
affordable housing consideration and rezoning requested by the Department of
Housing.
Transport (page 70)
· Data on
existing travel patterns and usage (Figure 25, page 72)
· New North
West – Harbour – South West rail line: with two new stations at
· 43
strategic bus corridors in
· Main road upgrades on Pacific Highway between
Chatswood and North Sydney to cater for growth pressures along this part of the
Global Economic Corridor – and a possible “metro-rail system” is mentioned
· Dedicated
rail freight infrastructure to ease pressure on the road system
· AusLink
Sydney Urban Corridor strategy for preparation with the Commonwealth Government
between 2009-2015
· A
metropolitan-wide parking policy is being prepared by the Department to guide
supply and management for centres
including St Leonards
· Local and
regional walking and cycling networks will be improved
Environment Heritage
and Resources (page 84)
· Improve and protect riparian
corridors and waterway health, protect the loss of biodiversity, conserve and
manage Aboriginal and other cultural heritage and protect air quality
· Preventing sedimentation and
stormwater pollution of the waterways and their respective tributaries; and
protecting areas of biodiversity from the introduction and expansion or weed
and pest species, bushfire risk, stormwater, erosion, and recreational
pressures
· Section 117 Direction on how stormwater
is to be considered in draft LEPs
· Applying
relevant stormwater targets in Lane Cove on a subcatchment basis through water
sensitive urban design
· The
· The Sydney Metropolitan Catchment
Management Authority will, with the assistance of councils, progressively
undertake stream mapping to enable councils to develop planning controls to
protect regionally significant riparian corridors.
· State Government and councils to
consider regional biodiversity matters to inform principal LEPs
· Councils to seek advice from the
Department of Environment and Climate Change on relevant existing information
and mapping relating to biodiversity
· Protect Aboriginal Cultural
Heritage and review registers: Done prior
to preparation of DLEP 2007
· Conserve
· Heritage Items and Conservation
Areas – Lane Cove
|
ABORINGINAL SITES |
LOCAL HERITAGE ITEMS IN LEP |
STATE HERITAGE ITEMS |
FEDERAL HERITAGE ITEMS |
CONSERVATION AREAS |
Lane Cove |
67 |
417 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
· Minimise household exposure to
unacceptable noise levels: The Department of Environment and Climate Change
will develop best practice guidelines on planning along transport corridors
with the Department of Planning, NSW Health and the Roads and Traffic
Authority: DLEP’s proposal for new flats
zones along
Parks, Public Places
and Culture
· Parks, public places and culture:
equitable access and sustainable management for parks and public places for all
residents and visitors. 1,854 hectares of the subregion is open space (19%) – a
detailed breakdown of use is at page 102
· The quality of life within the subregion is also influenced by the
cultural activities available to residents. The subregion’s main streets,
plazas, civic squares and waterfronts are important meeting places for social
interaction and establish a sense of place including the Lane Cove Plaza
· In planning for future growth of centres, councils are to consider the
need for new civic spaces, wider footpaths and boulevards
· Distance: Lane Cove and the
subregion are generally serviced well by open space within 10 minutes walk
· Constraints:
· Facilities: Increasing demand to develop
regional sport facility hubs. A shortage of facilities to meet demands of some
age groups for some sports. A need for
more informal, family orientated areas. Upgrade playing fields to district
level (local cost implications)
· There are two significant regional open
space funding programs available to Inner North councils to improve quality and
access to regional open space and the foreshores of
· Improve access
to waterways and links between bushland, parks and Strategic Centres and local
centres
· Completion of gaps and improvement to
existing trails such as
· Upgrade existing walking tracks along the
Harbour foreshore,
· Where there is
local open space, councils should consider an open space embellishment program
that improves facilities to encourage use
· Inner North Councils to investigate the provision of additional
multipurpose indoor sports facilities to meet the needs of the current and
future populations of the subregion
· Recognise the
night economy to protect entertainment and nightlife clusters
Implementation and Governance
· Annual monitoring
committee of Department of Planning with councils’ CEOs
· Actions for Lane
Cove: Completion of the Principal LEP.
Conclusion
The goals of the
Inner North Subregional Strategy in planning for some level of growth over the
next 25 years are accepted in principle. The specific targets for residential
and employment growth are acknowledged, in so far as being incorporated into
Council’s Draft Comprehensive Local Environmental Plan, but Council has not yet
had the opportunity to place them on public exhibition. In the interim, prior
to this community consultation, Council should call upon the State Government
to address the following concerns:-
(i) the
importance of providing criteria for assessing the amount of open space and
other resources required in proportion to an increasing population, and the
fact that to the extent that these factors limit growth in
(ii) the
need for the State Government to make a commitment to a more detailed
infrastructure plan, to be prepared in consultation with councils in a
subregional planning forum, for the same 25-year timeframe of the Strategy to
2031.
It is recommended
that Council make a submission on the Strategy in accordance with the draft at
AT 1.
That Council:- 1. Note
the Draft Inner North Subregional Strategy 2. Make
a submission on the Subregional Strategy’s exhibition in accordance with the
draft at AT 1 to this Report No.21. |
Michael Mason
Executive Manager
Environmental Services Division
AT‑1 View |
Submission on the Draft
Inner North Subregional Strategy |
4 Pages |
|
CNL030907ES_21
***** End of Environmental Services Division
Report No. 21 *****
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION REPORT NO.
24 |
|
3 SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Ordinary Council
at the Meeting 3 September
2007
28/08/2007 to Ordinary Council
Environmental Services Division Report No. 24
Subject:
Record No: DA07/119 - 24539/07
Author(s): Peter
Thomas
Executive Summary
· A
Development Application has been submitted for the demolition of the existing
dwelling house and the erection of a 2 storey dwelling house and swimming pool.
· The
proposal complies with Council’s requirements with the exception of floor space
ratio, which exceeds the 0.5:1 maximum.
· The
proposal attracted one letter of objection.
The reasons for objection included:
o Proposal exceeds the 0.5:1 floor space ratio
o Setback of the pool
o Tree removals
These
issues are fully discussed in the original report which is attached.
· A copy of
the original assessment report recommending refusal of the proposal is attached
to this report as AT1.
The applicant has
been requested to address the excess in Floor Space Ratio and submit amended
plans. At the time of drafting this
report the applicant is yet to submit the requested plans. However, such are anticipated before the
Council meeting.
The application is
submitted for determination.
Background
The Development
application was considered at the Planning and Building Committee Meeting of 20
August 2007.
The report before the
Committee sought to refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The
proposed floor space ratio of 0.59:1 exceeds Council’s maximum requirement of
0.5:1 under the Code for Dwellings.
2. The
proposal is considered likely to adversely affect the amenity of the area.
3. The
bulk and scale of the proposed dwelling house is considered excessive.
4. The
proposal creates an undesirable precedent for further applications with a floor
space in excess of the Code for Dwellings.
5. The
proposal is not in the public interest.
The Planning and
Building Committee considered the report and resolved:
That the owners and the architect consider amendments that would reduce
the proposed floor space and present to Council for determination.
The applicant has
reviewed the proposal and had a further meeting with Council’s officers.
At the time of
preparation of this report, the amended plans had not been received. The applicant has however indicated that they
have had success in reducing the floor space ratio to 0.55:1, which was
generally the figure being considered by the Planning and Building
Committee. The floor space ratio is to
be verified once the amended plans are received and reported separately to
Councillors prior to the Council Meeting.
Draft conditions of
consent have been prepared should Council wish to approve the application
notwithstanding the excessive floor space ratio of 0.55:1. The draft conditions
are contained in AT2.
That the report be
received and the Council determine the development application. |
Michael Mason
Executive Manager
Environmental Services Division
AT‑1 View |
Original DA report to
Planning and Building Committee meeting of 20 August2007 |
8 Pages |
|
AT‑2 View |
Draft Conditions of
Consent |
10 Pages |
|
CNL030907ES_24
***** End of Environmental Services Division
Report No. 24 *****
|
|
3
SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Ordinary Council
at the Meeting 3 September
2007
28/08/2007 to Ordinary Council
Environmental Services Division Report No. 25
Subject:
Record No: DA07/76 - 24546/07
Author(s): Peter
Thomas
Executive Summary
· A
Development Application has been submitted for the carrying out of alterations
and additions to the existing dwelling house and the erection of a carport at
the front of the property.
· The
proposal complies with Council’s requirements with the exception of floor space
ratio, which exceeds the 0.5:1 maximum, encroachment on the front building
line, non compliance with the side setback and loss of privacy from the
proposed deck.
· No
objections were received to the proposal.
· A copy of
the original assessment report recommending refusal of the proposal is attached
to this report as AT1.
The applicant has
been requested to amend the carport and staff to prepare draft consent conditions
for consideration by Council. This
application is submitted for determination.
Background
The Development
application was considered at the Planning and Building Committee Meeting of 20
August 2007.
The report before the
Committee sought to refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The
proposed development does not comply with the aims and objectives of the Lane
Cove Local Environmental plan, 1987, as amended.
2. The
proposal does not comply with clause 18A of the Lane Cove Local Environmental
Plan, 1987, as amended.
3. The
proposed development does not comply with the objectives and the provisions of
Lane Cove Code for Dwelling Houses, Fences, Private Swimming pools and
Outbuildings.
4. The
development application contains inaccurate information.
Particulars of the
non compliances are elaborated upon in the original report which is attached.
The Planning and
Building Committee considered the report and resolved:
THAT the General Manager prepare draft conditions of approval and the
applicant submit treatment details of the carport boundary wall and the matter
be referred to the Council meeting of 3 September 2007 for determination.
At the time of
preparation of this report, the carport details had not been received. Once received, they shall be commented upon
and reported separately to Councillors, prior to the Council Meeting.
Draft conditions of
consent have been prepared should Council wish to approve the application. The
draft conditions are contained in AT2.
That the report be
received and that Council determine the development application. |
Michael Mason
Executive Manager
Environmental Services Division
AT‑1 View |
Original Report to
Planning and Building Committee of 20 August 2007 |
10 Pages |
|
AT‑2 View |
Draft conditions of
consent |
7 Pages |
|
CNL030907ES_25
***** End of Environmental Services Division
Report No. 25 *****
***** END OF AGENDA *****